Standardization of Advancement
The short passage below has had more influence on what I do as a scoutmaster than anything else.
From Baden-Powell’s OUTLOOK November, 1921
In
view of a very elaborate curriculum that was recently drawn up by one
authority for standardizing the test for badges, I was obliged to
criticize it in this sense: I hope that the compilers are not losing
sight the aim and spirit of the Movement by making it into a training
school of efficiency through curricula marks, and standards.
Our
aim is merely to help the boys, especially the least scholarly ones, to
become personally enthused in subjects that appeal to them
individually, and that will be helpful to them. We do this through the
fun and jollity of Scouting; by progressive states they can be led on
naturally and unconsciously, to develop for themselves their knowledge.
But if once we make it into a formal scheme of serious instruction for
efficiency, we miss the whole point and value of the Scout training and
we trench the work of the schools without the trained experts for
carrying it out.
We have to remember that Scoutmasters are
voluntary play leaders in the game of Scouting, and not qualified
schoolteachers, and to give them a hard-and-fast syllabus is to check
the ardor and their originality in dealing with their boys according to
local conditions. I could quite imagine it frightening away many
Scoutmasters of the right sort. The syllabus as suggested seems to go a
good deal beyond what is prescribed as our dose in Scouting For Boys;
and if the proportions of the ingredients in a prescriptions are not
adhered to you can not well blame the doctor if the medicine doesn’t
work. Our standard for badge earning—as I have frequently said—is not
to attain a certain level of quality of work (as in school), but the
AMOUNT OF EFFORT EXERCISED BY THE INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE. This brings the
most hopeless case on a footing of equal possibility with his more
brilliant or better-off brother. We want to get them ALL along through
cheery self development from within and not through the imposition of
formal instruction from without











Comments